Fast forward 15 years or so since I left IGA and I still think of Ron whenever I read something on the lifetime value of a customer. The idea behind the concept is that if you serve the wants and needs of a customer with the right product, at the right place, with the right price, and with proper communication, the customer will make repeat purchases. The customer is not to be considered for just one buy; he or she is a lifetime of satisfied buys. But then I think about Ron, and his street smart approach to how not all satisfied customers are desirable. The story I'm thinking about goes like this:
Every week, a couple would come in to West End IGA and buy a bunch of perfect bananas. Then, later in the week, they would return a few bad banana, requesting money back for the entire bunch- or a full replenishment of a bunch. But, they wouldn't just do this for produce. They would also run the scam with meats. I'd seen it a few times and Ron noticed it too. One day, the couple was at it again, so Ron tapped me on the shoulder and said, "Come with me Bob, watch and learn how we are going to handle this."
We approached the couple and Ron, with a broad smile said, "Great to see you today! How are you?" After the couple responded, Ron continued, "I know that you're regular shoppers here. We love having you shop here. We've also noticed that you've been having trouble with some produce and some meat. Here's what we'll do. Bob and I will help you shop today. Think of us as your personal shopper for produce and meat. We want you happy with what you pick so none of us will have the hassle of a return. Of course, if the ones we pick out end up end up being returned, well... then that's not being honest." The couple agreed and never returned to the store. Ron had fired undesirable customers. He was so eloquent. He sent them away. Ron's reason for firing the couple, of course, was driven by dollars and cents.
There is another reason why companies ought to legitimately fire customers- and it is does not receive nearly the profile that it ought to. Some customers simple request for unethical / immoral purchases. In my consulting, I advise companies to fire both non-profitable customers (unless their is strategic reason to keep them) and to have a code of ethics in business. This way, if a customer violates the standards, the decision to fire the customer is a lot easier. I've heard the argument so many times that business will do whatever- and sell whatever- so long as it is legal. This has not been my experience. Companies and brands have values. They stand for things. If the brand does a transgression, consumers will demand accountability. Management also has things that are important to them. Here's an example to make my point. Companies like CafePress, TShirt Hell, and Zazzle, which position themselves "offensive design companies" have limits (The limits might still be minimal, but they are there). Consider Zazzle's response to an intentionally offending purchase order.
"We are sorry to inform you that we are unable to process your Zazzle order due to violations in your Zazzle design. You can expect the returning funds to be available in your account within the next 7-10 business days, depending on the processing speed of the financial institution that authorized the initial transaction.
You can easily modify your product and reorder to fit within the allowed guidelines. Instructions for this process are outlined below. If you choose to modify and reorder, we will give your new order special attention to make sure your customized products arrive quickly."
Zazzle will shoot down designs that contain content that can reasonably be viewed as discriminatory based on everything from race to disability-or wildly explicit and suggestive material.
In short, they are saying, change what you write or get lost. And they do it in such a nice way, that my favorite boss Ron would be proud.