Mel Gibson provides us with one of the most interesting case studies of celebrity brand rehabilitation out there. Let's take a look at where he was, where he's at, and how he destroyed the various segments of his brand base. Ultimately, I’ll address the question is Mel's brand past the point of no return?
A Selective Chronology of Mel Gibson’s Career
Let's go back in time to 1985 when Deloreans allowed us to do this sort of thing. Mel Gibson was the toast of celebrity. He had been awarded People Magazine's Sexiest Man Alive and he had the hottest actresses in Hollywood swooning over him by saying things like he's "the most gorgeous man I've ever met" (Sigourney Weaver). Indeed, the guy had the royal flush of looks. That's not a bad place to be to develop a gargantuan gaggle of female fans.
But Gibson had more than just a female fan base. His persona grew through the iconic characters that he played like Martin Riggs (Lethal Weapons) and Mad Max (Mad Max trilogy). These action characters grew Gibson's appeal with young men. In fact, in 2000, Gibson's star power was so universal and deep that he could drive blockbuster returns in action/dramas (the Patriot), romantic comedies (What Women Want), and animated family movies (Chicken Run). Let’s put this in a financial perspective. In 2000, the Patriot grossed $113 million, What Women Want $183 million, and Chicken Run $107 million. From my observations at IMDB, Gibson is only actor to be in 3 movies in one year that grossed over $100,000,000 each.
Of course, these numbers are impressive to any film producer and or studio exec. And if you are a good employee, as Gibson was, your bosses are your fans. So Mel made a lot of media moguls very happy- and a lot of the media moguls are Jewish. (Check out this fun article by Joel Stein on "Who Runs Hollywood".)
As we know, Mel Gibson was more than just an A plus-list actor- he was also a talent who could write, direct and produce epic films. Ask a group of guys what their favorite movies of all time are and I'll bet you'll hear "Braveheart" more than once. This movie champions the underdog and has contributed to some of the most inspiring moments in cinema. (YouTube clip - forward to 1:30) Through Braveheart, Gibson’s earned the respect and admiration of the artists in Hollywood and Braveheart was nominated for 10 Academy Awards and took home 5 Oscars including Best Director and Best Film.
Then of course, in 2004 Gibson did something totally off-the-wall. He produced the The Passion of the Christ. - a religious film with gritty levels of corporal punishment where the actors speak in Aramaic- a dead language. By Hollywood formula, this movie was doomed to fail. It was based on a religious theme, contained NC-17 level violence, was subtitled in an unusual language, and released in spring- traditionally a weak time for the box office. In spite of all of these "deficits", the film branded “A Mel Gibson Film: Passion of the Christ” became one of the top 15 best selling domestic box office movies of all times. Gibson's success in the box office was partly attributed to attracting a large Christian audience- a new and unlikely group of fans.
Gibson's personal life was also kind of cool. Gibson was rumored to be hard core partier, prankster on set and “an on the edge” kind of guy but he had also been married to the same woman for 28 years, a rarity in Hollywood where multiple divorces are the norm.(wiki) Even the Simpsons parodied America's love for Gibson and Marge felt a little randy thinking about Mel's fidelity and devotion to his family. In a way Gibson was like a wolf- as wild as he was he seemed to mate for life. This image clearly has a lot of sex appeal.
But all that began to unravel in 2006. Immediately before the release of Apocalypto, Gibson had a major meltdown. After being pulled over for drunk driving (12% blood alcohol level) in Malibu, Gibson called an arresting officer “sugar tits” and made his infamous insult to Jewish people. Gibson immediately had a PR team orchestrate a response: Issue an immediate apology, lie low to decrease the intensity of associations linking Gibson to racism and drunkenness, then beg for forgiveness from the Jewish community. Headlines about Gibson’s racism were extensive and the damage to the Gibson brand was particularly strong in Hollywood circles. Endeavor Agency founder Ari Emanuel wrote an open letter to the Hollywood community requesting Mel Gibson be blacklisted. Shock jock Howard Stern called Gibson "a filthy anti-Semite". Rob Reiner said that Gibson’s apology for his drunken remarks was not enough and Joan Rivers said that Mel Gibson "is an anti-Semitic son of a bitch. He should f’ing die!” (Wikipedia)
That being said, Gibson had several Hollywood defenders come to his side including the late Patrick Swayze, Jodie Foster and M. Night Shyamalan, Robert Downey Jr, and Richard Donner. These celebrities blamed Gibson's alcohol for Gibson's problematic behaviour.(Wikipedia)
Then in early 2009, paparazzi publshed photos of Gibson having an affair. In April of the same year, Gibson debuted his pregnant girlfriend, Oksana Grigorieva, at the premiere of X-Men (Times) and began divorce proceedings with his wife of 28 years. The divorce settlement was kept private but reports surfaced estimating Gibson's treasure between $800million and $1.2 billion. Gibson’s wife's share via the divorce settlement has been estimated around estimated at $470,000,000 with the couple sharing joint custody of their 7 children. (Australian, TMZ, BittennBound). But, Gibson's affair with Grigorieva was short lived. In April, 2010- the couple split after Grigorieva delivered Gibson's 8th child (People).
On July 12th, the first of series of professionally audio-recorded phone fights between Gibson and Grigorieva were released by Radar Online, an independent online entertainment magazine. These files ended up being cover stories on celebrity magazines, lead stories on news variety shows, and fodder for talk show banter. Far worse for Gibson is that the recordings make for excellent Internet consumption. The transcripts of Gibson’s rants are truly despicable and disgraceful but do not give justice to the intensity of hatred and anger that Gibson spews. You can listen to the alleged recordings here. Warning they are extremely fowl. (Censored Leak "Racist rant"; Uncensored "Angry Racist Rant", Uncensored Violent Rant If these tapes are indeed legit and non-doctored, Gibson has assaulted his girlfriend while holding their child, and slurred against Blacks, Hispanics and his girlfriend in venomous, toxic rages.
So what’s the point of the above chronology? The point is this- Gibson was the Hollywood hunk who could act, produce, and direct blockbusters in pretty much any genre. He was the guy who earned critical acclaim from his peers and lived the ultimate success story in art, business and family. And, he was the “edgy man” with one of the largest fan bases out there. Then he had 2 major meltdowns that stripped away his fan segments. Through his verbal abuse and alleged physical abuse of his girlfriend, he obliterated his female fan base; through his derogatory slurs against Jews, Blacks and Hispanics, he has enraged many in Hollywood, insulted those ethnic groups and offended the sensibilities of all people; through his adultery, Gibson betrayed his family; through his cursing, Gibson blasphemed his Passion viewers. In short, Mel's image stripped away pretty much every segment that loved him. In the process he was fired by his talent agency and is getting counselling from Britney Spears. Things do not look good for Gibson’s brand.
Should Mel Gibson be Rebuilt?
I am going to by-pass a lengthy discussion on the question Should Gibson’s career even be rebuilt? Even though ideologues make the case that society should not reward behavior like this, the reality is that many celebrities have done a lot of horrendous things and have come back. Alec Baldwin was caught on tape making menacing threats against his 14 year old daughter who he called “little pig”. Charlie Sheen’s been in hot water for multiple accounts of domestic violence. Michael Jackson had a litany of child molestation charges. But the grand-daddy of sick behaviour belongs to director Roman Polanski who was convicted of drugging and anally raping a 13-year-old girl. Yet, Polanski never served any criminal punishment for that despicable crime. Celebrity seems to create immunity to deviant behaviors.
Complexities of the Gibson image rebuild
The Gibson rebuild is more complex than other celebrity brand rebuilds for a few reasons. First, because of Passion of the Christ, Gibson was exposed as a practicing Catholic meaning that his recent behaviors are hypocritical. Hypocrisy adds a juicy nice news story dimension and makes forgiveness a lot less believable. Second, Gibson’s rants are tailor made for the Internet. Unlike the other transgressors, Gibson voice is all over MP3 files that are being virally spread over the internet. Third, Gibson already has done one Mae Culpa so a second one is less likely to be believed. There is a line in the movie Thank You for Smoking where the Captain (Duval) asks Nick Naylor (Eckhart) if he likes his work. Naylor responds, “Yes sir…if you can do tobacco, you can do anything.” Well, in PR, if you can rebuild Gibson, you can rebuild anything. Let’s dive into the best way to do it.
Perspectives on Mel Gibson image rebuild
Gibson is currently lying low and not making public statement. This is standard PR celebrity rebuild strategy. Defense of Gibson is being done by a 3rd party through the court system. Some of this may involve discrediting Grigorieva. In the meantime, the PR firm is collecting the facts, advising Gibson to keep out of the public eye. The next steps of the conventional strategy are:
1> Once the scope of the recordings has been ascertained, issue an apology to family, fans and take ownership of the rants. It is easy to believe that Gibson was under the influence of alcohol during some of these rants. Gibson the actor clearly has the ability to deliver a charmed “I’m sorry”.
2> Check into substance abuse rehabilitation, relationship therapy, and anger management classes.
3> Quietly settle a child support settlement with Grigorieva., if possible. Some would call this hush money.
4> Stay out of the public eye- and trouble for a couple of years. A sabbatical to one of Gibson’s islands could be one of the resting places.
5> Return to his trade using a big talk show circuit.
But there are a few glitches with this approach. First, the recordings are being leaked out one at a time and appear unlikely to stop. Furthermore, Gibson, who was clearly unaware that he was being recorded, has no idea how many more recordings remain or what might be on the subsequent recordings. This makes the “I’m sorry” defense positioning much trickier. I will argue here that the ongoing recording leakages are calculated and orchestrated to exhibit maximum damage to the Gibson image. The ongoing leaks that link Gibson to violence and racism are going to be harder to shake. It appears that hell hath no fury like a woman scorned– especially when she teams up with Radar Online. Second, Gibson’s already had a major Mea Culpa and has already burned a tremendous amount of goodwill with media friends, colleagues, and his public. In other words, a radical, non traditional approach is necessary for the Gibson rebuild.
So, while Gibson has his lawyers defending his financial interests, family interests, and honor in the court system and has detectives examining illegal recording of phone conversations, extortion etc., here are a few much less conventional PR brand image rehab approaches.
Get on a popular sitcom... Rather than lying low, Mel Gibson’s should increase his visibility. That’s right- Gibson ought to do the exact opposite of what conventional publicists, agents and managers will be recommending. While Gibson’s recordings continue to drip out like Chinese water torture, Gibson should be making a guest appearances in some tv shows. If Gibson appeared on, say 2 and a Half Men, Gibson will be appearing in a popular comedy which will help take some edge off of his angry, abusive image. Viewers frequently spill television/movie characters’ persona on to the actor himself (the argument I made about how Gibson attracted his male fan base) and a likeable character can return some Gibson goodwill. Furthermore, Gibson would be staring alongside Charlie Sheen who is himself going through a difficult period. If Sheen gets some forgiveness, surely some spill-over forgiveness can head Gibson’s way. Why would 2 and a Half Men go for this? Ratings. Ratings. Ratings. Who wouldn’t want to tune in to see how Meltdown Mel is doing?
Get back to the Robyn's Nest... if you can!
The people betrayed the most in the scandal has been Gibson’s ex-wife Robyn. Ironically, she is the woman who has been Gibson’s most ardent defender and, according to TMZ (http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/15/mel-gibson-robyn-gibson-declaration-domestic-violence-court-filed/) has stated, : "Mel never engaged in any physical abuse of any kind toward me before, during or after our marriage” and "Mel was a wonderful and loving father." Whether she has financial incentive to keep Mel out of trouble – or if the woman is just a saint- in either case, Mel returning to his wife would certainly be a public relations triumph.
Film is where it's at for Mel
The best of Gibson's career past is in library of 30 years of films. So an active campaign to have Gibson reruns on cable TV and networks is an obvious step to relink audiences with the likable Gibson of old. Which takes us to the final point.
Gibson still has a fortune to spend on movie-making. Getting Gibson very quickly behind the camera to direct another Icon Pictures film would shift some of the nasty press to “Gibson is shooting another movie.” Gibson’s still got the money to hire an A lister (IMDB reports that he was in early stages of a Viking movie that may star diCaprio) or go it alone with another independent headline-less film. Any film produced by Gibson will receive tremendous publicity which will reduce marketing costs and make making a profitable film that much easier. This is what helped to bring back Sheen, Polanski, and Baldwin. The faster Gibson is back at what he does best, the better off he is.
Another provocative PR piece Bob. Love it. - J
ReplyDeleteVery good idea!! Could a Lindsay Lohan do the same??
ReplyDeleteLindsay's situation is different and therefore, imo, requires a different remedy. 1. Lindsay behavioral problems are more "standard". Gibson's rants are so extreme and "out in left field"; 2.Lindsay is not perceived as hypocritical; 3. Lindsay attracts less media attention (she was never really a big A lister, if at all)
ReplyDeleteNice piece of work Bob, Mel was so sexy in the 80's, I especially like his haircut in Lethal Weapon. Personally, concerning your recovery strategies, I would personally favor 2, 3 and the reality show. This can be compared, in a heaviest fashion I must agree, to Tom Cruise whose image has been suffering in the last few years and who is proposing to make it clear that he is "normal" through a reality show. Rock on!
ReplyDeleteJF
.Here is my point of view about Mel Gibson (i feel like a made a research on his life) :) :
ReplyDeleteEverything that happens to us in this life comes from the seeds that we planted.
People do things and then dont understand why things happen to them. Radiohead has an interesting perspective on that in their song "karma police" ("this is what you get").
Mel choose a profession with a very high standards in which people see him as a model so he should market himself as best as he can and to keep this line otherwise he will have to bear his consequences.
Mel's branding at the moment is negative mainly due to the records, I think it's still not the time for him to defend and rebuild his career - currently he is branded with clear evidences of violence and racism. The same thing for example with Britney Spears who caught the public eye as a bad mother - no matter what she did to change that image or what she would do, this branding will continue to accompany her. people remember her that way.
About the movie Passion of the Christ - I did not watch the movie so I can not express a specific opinion on the content (it wasnt illegal in Israel, but didnt find a distributor), but in general I think Mel formulated a religious hero templates of previous movies that he had already taken part, including struggles and religious motifs (Braveheart, The Patriot, We were soldiers).
I read about Mel Gibson during the day trying to figure out the long and fast way that he made from a great actor and creator to the violence and racism person as he presenting today. I think that most of the problems associated with the separation from his wife Robyn after 28 years and his ex gf, Oksana Grigorieva- you can see the differences between those two women- one supporting and the other one destroying. People fit themself to the person that they are living with, (28 years he was polite and loving with his wife which is rare in hollywood and then violence with his gf....). I dont know much about the story with the records, just from your blog and little of what i was reading today and i am absolutely against what he said, but for some reason i am sure that Oksana is not inoccent at all...she recorded him without his knowledge (it's illegal in many places) in order to destroy him... so i think that first thing he need to do is to think of the people that he bring into his life.
Here is my point of view about Mel Gibson (i feel like a made a research on his life) :) :
ReplyDeleteEverything that happens to us in this life comes from the seeds that we planted.
People do things and then dont understand why things happen to them. Radiohead has an interesting perspective on that in their song "karma police" ("this is what you get").
Mel choose a profession with a very high standards in which people see him as a model so he should market himself as best as he can and to keep this line otherwise he will have to bear his consequences.
Mel's branding at the moment is negative mainly due to the records, I think it's still not the time for him to defend and rebuild his career - currently he is branded with clear evidences of violence and racism. The same thing for example with Britney Spears who caught the public eye as a bad mother - no matter what she did to change that image or what she would do, this branding will continue to accompany her. people remember her that way.
ReplyDeleteAbout the movie Passion of the Christ - I did not watch the movie so I can not express a specific opinion on the content (it wasnt illegal in Israel, but didnt find a distributor), but in general I think Mel formulated a religious hero templates of previous movies that he had already taken part, including struggles and religious motifs (Braveheart, The Patriot, We were soldiers).
I read about Mel Gibson during the day trying to figure out the long and fast way that he made from a great actor and creator to the violence and racism person as he presenting today. I think that most of the problems associated with the separation from his wife Robyn after 28 years and his ex gf, Oksana Grigorieva- you can see the differences between those two women- one supporting and the other one destroying. People fit themself to the person that they are living with, (28 years he was polite and loving with his wife which is rare in hollywood and then violence with his gf....). I dont know much about the story with the records, just from your blog and little of what i was reading today and i am absolutely against what he said, but for some reason i am sure that Oksana is not inoccent at all...she recorded him without his knowledge (it's illegal in many places) in order to destroy him... so i think that first thing he need to do is to think of the people that he bring into his life.
I read your blog with great interest. I also took some of the links. Gibson has been a very large and QUIET donor to many of the groups that he slurred. His behavior here is inconsistent with his previous actions. There is a role to play somehow.
ReplyDeleteYou bet Tiger wouldn't come back but Gibson might?
ReplyDeleteI agree with Bob. For Woods to come back he has to win again and then get his sponsors back. (Woods' sport performance is hampered by his knee injuries, potential heckling on the course by fans etc). Gibson's money and success is driven off of him making cool movies. He can self finance movies to make a hit- but Woods can not self finance a win in the golf tournaments. Tiger gets one shot for put. Gibson gets many movie takes.
ReplyDeleteHere's a brand rehabilitation thought: Mel should donate 95% of his fortune to shelters for battered women and the Anti-defamation league. With his donation he should say something like: "I struggle with hateful thoughts which I cannot always control. When I'm rational, I know these thoughts are wrong and I'm getting help to get better. In the meantime, to demonstrate my sincerity towards fixing my problems, I am making these donations which I hope can help repair some of the damage I've caused."
ReplyDeleteLooks like Mel didn't have a lot of carnage to his career. Check these puppies out:
ReplyDeleteAround 80% say the meltdowns have no effect on seeing a Gibson movie.
http://www.shadowandact.com/?p=30399
http://www.thefablife.com/2010-08-31/mel-gibson-as-popular-now-as-he-was-before-he-lost-his-mind/
The trouble for Gibson will likely be inside Hollywood. Leo DiC pulled out of the Gibson-epic-in-the-making http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1644642/20100729/story.jhtml I am sure that will go away if Meldown Mel has some hits, which is driven off the public support.
ReplyDeleteHi Professor-
ReplyDeleteFunny how you thought Mel Gibson could get his career back on track by going on 2.5 men. Now Charlie Sheen's derailment makes Gibson's look a lot less severe. Wouldn't it be ironic if Mel Gibson took Charlie Sheen's place?